
Why Albert Chevallier Tayler matters
Albert Chevallier Tayler is a well documented but market-thin figure of late Victorian and Edwardian British painting. Trained across the leading London art schools and in Paris, he moved between the plein-air realism of the Newlyn School and conventional London society portraiture. For collectors, he is a case study in how a single strong, subject-driven auction result, in his case a cricket painting, can define the public record of an artist whose broader market otherwise trades in modest, infrequent sales.
- Born
- 1862-04-05, Leytonstone, Essex, England
- Nationality
- British
- Media
- Painting
- Movement
- Newlyn School, Victorian and Edwardian genre painting
- Education
- Bloxham School; Heatherley's School of Art, London; Royal Academy Schools, London; Slade School of Fine Art (scholarship, 1879); atelier of Jean-Paul Laurens, Paris
- Signature motifs
- Genre scenes of domestic and military life, Cricket subjects, Society and military portraiture
By the numbers
- GBP 680,000Auction highKent v Lancashire at Canterbury, Sotheby's London, June 2006
- 1862 to 1925LifespanBorn Leytonstone, Essex; died London
- Newlyn SchoolMovementPlein-air painting circle, Cornwall
- Paris Salon medal, 1891HonorAwarded at the Paris Exposition/Salon
Selected works
Click any work to view it full screen.
Biography
Albert Chevallier Tayler was born on 5 April 1862 in Leytonstone, then in Essex, on the edge of London, the son of William Moseley Tayler, a lawyer, and Elizabeth Sarah Warren. He was educated at Bloxham School in Oxfordshire before moving into formal art training, studying at Heatherley's School of Art and the Royal Academy Schools in London, and winning a scholarship to the Slade School of Fine Art in 1879. He also trained in Paris, attending Jean-Paul Laurens' atelier and reportedly studying under Carolus-Duran, in the pattern common to many artists associated with the Newlyn School.
Tayler joined the Newlyn School's colony of plein-air painters in Cornwall, arriving in September 1884 and remaining associated with the colony for about eleven years before leaving for good in 1895, a longer and more settled period than some later reference sources, which have understated it as only two years. He exhibited regularly at the Royal Academy over several decades, but was never elected an Associate or full Academician. He also showed with the New English Art Club, the Royal Society of British Artists, and the Royal Institute of Oil Painters, and in 1891 received a medal at the Paris Salon. Later in his career he moved toward society and portrait subjects, continuing to exhibit widely.
Tayler died on 20 December 1925 in London, at the age of 63, according to a contemporaneous notice reproduced by Brave Fine Art, which also records his interment at St. Mary's Cemetery, Kensal Green.
Critical reception
Tayler's reputation rests less on sustained critical commentary than on institutional placement: regular Royal Academy exhibition, membership in the Royal Society of British Artists, participation in the New English Art Club and the Royal Institute of Oil Painters, and a 1891 Paris Salon medal all mark him as a solidly professional, if not top-tier, figure of his generation. Penlee House Gallery and Museum, which frames him within the Newlyn School, notes that despite exhibiting at the Royal Academy "regularly," he was never elected to Associate or full Membership there, a detail that situates him just outside the first rank of his contemporaries. Some auction catalogues have rendered his professional affiliations inconsistently, for example listing him under the non-standard designation "R.B.C." rather than the documented NEA, RBA, and ROI initials used in dealer and reference sources, a minor but recurring inconsistency collectors should be aware of.
Market
Tayler's auction market is thin and dominated by a single headline result. Wikipedia and auction-market aggregators identify a large cricket painting, Kent v Lancashire at Canterbury, long held by Kent County Cricket Club, sold at Sotheby's, London, in June 2006 for GBP 680,000, as his all-time auction high; Wikipedia describes it as "a record price for a cricket painting." The exact day of sale is not confirmed in available sources. Beyond this result, his auction activity consists of smaller, irregular sales of portraits and genre pictures through UK regional auction houses and dealers, with no evidence of a subsequent sale approaching the 2006 result as of mid-2026.
Top auction results
| Work | Price | Sale |
|---|---|---|
| Kent v Lancashire at Canterbury (2006) | USD 1,258,000 (GBP 680,000) | Sotheby's, London |
Selected exhibitions
| Years | Exhibition | Venues |
|---|---|---|
| 1880s to 1920s | Regular exhibitor | Royal Academy, London |
| 1891 | Paris Salon / Exposition | Paris |
| undated | Regular exhibitor | New English Art Club, London |
| undated | Member and exhibitor | Royal Society of British Artists, London |
| undated | Exhibitor | Royal Institute of Oil Painters, London |
Museum collections
- Walker Art Gallery, National Museums Liverpool
- Birmingham Museums Trust
- Penlee House Gallery and Museum, Penzance
Awards and honors
- Medal, Paris Salon (Exposition) (1891)
Authentication and provenance
No catalogue raisonne.
No catalogue raisonne or estate authentication body has been identified for Tayler. His works are verified mainly through auction house provenance research, dealer records, and the public museum collections that hold his paintings.
Primary reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Chevallier_Tayler
What collectors should know
Tayler's market is small, and his best-known result, the GBP 680,000 sale of Kent v Lancashire at Canterbury in 2006, appears to reflect the strong appeal of cricket subject matter to a specialist buyer pool as much as broad demand for his oeuvre generally. There is no catalogue raisonne and no evidence of an active estate or dedicated representing gallery as of mid-2026; his work circulates through UK regional auction houses and dealers such as Brave Fine Art rather than through a single authoritative market channel. Collectors should treat provenance and prior museum or exhibition history as the primary tools for vetting a work, given the absence of a centralized authentication body, and should weigh the 2006 cricket-painting result as an outlier rather than a representative benchmark for his broader market.
Further reading and resources
Data current as of 2026-07-10.

