Dai Mingyue
Chinese (listed as such by both Artprice and MutualArt auction-market indices; not independently confirmed by a biographical source)

Why Dai Mingyue matters
At present, the name Dai Mingyue is documented only in auction-market reference indices, principally Artprice and MutualArt, and these two sources disagree with each other on basic biographical dates and on any auction-record claim. No museum, gallery, catalogue raisonne, obituary, or scholarly biography naming this individual could be located. For a collector, this matters primarily as a caution: it illustrates why a name appearing in a recognized market database, even in more than one such database, is not sufficient grounds for attribution, valuation, or purchase without further primary-source verification, particularly when the databases themselves cannot agree on the underlying facts.
- Nationality
- Chinese (listed as such by both Artprice and MutualArt auction-market indices; not independently confirmed by a biographical source)
Biography
Auction-market indices disagree on this individual's life dates. Artprice's global artist index lists "DAI Mingyue" with life years 1609 to 1686. MutualArt has, in separate instances, listed the same name with life years given as circa 1608 to 1686, and elsewhere as 1625 to 1670. No source located in current research confirms a birthplace, training, teacher, painting school, or stylistic description for this person, and no independent biographical source corroborates any of these date ranges. Searches for the name in Chinese and English, including variant orderings such as "Mingyue Dai," returned only unrelated individuals with similar names in fields such as business, engineering, and academia, none of them artists. Because the two available market sources disagree with each other on the underlying dates, and neither is corroborated independently, this biography, including the life dates, should be read as unconfirmed rather than established.
Critical reception
No critical writing, museum wall text, exhibition catalogue essay, or named-critic commentary about Dai Mingyue could be located in current research, and no verbatim quotes are available to cite. A separate Ming dynasty painter surnamed Dai, given elsewhere with dates of circa 1388 to 1462, and an unrelated contemporary performance artist named Dai Guangyu, are documented elsewhere, but neither is connected to this entry, and none of that material can be responsibly attributed to Dai Mingyue without conflating separate identities.
Market
No single auction record for Dai Mingyue can be confirmed. A secondary aggregator, MutualArt, has returned two mutually inconsistent claims across separate queries: a reported USD 100,378 for a work titled "Calligraphy in Running Script" at Sotheby's Hong Kong in 2024, and, separately, a reported USD 332,023 for a work titled "Bamboo and Rock" at China Guardian Auctions in Beijing in 2014. These figures conflict with each other and could not be corroborated against a primary auction house archive or a second independent database, so neither is treated as a confirmed record and none is published here. Artprice's index entry for this name contains no sale, price, or lot information. This artist also does not currently appear with any market metrics in Masterworks internal systems.
What collectors should know
Any work offered under the name Dai Mingyue should be treated with heightened caution until independent verification is available. There is no confirmed catalogue raisonne, no confirmed gallery or estate representation, no confirmed museum holding, and no confirmed auction record for this name, and the underlying identity rests on database index entries giving only a name and disputed life years. Collectors should also be alert to the possibility of transliteration ambiguity, since "Dai" and "Mingyue" are common Chinese name elements that appear, in various combinations, attached to multiple unrelated people, some of them artists and most of them not. A prospective buyer should request documented provenance, exhibition history, and, ideally, an independent scholarly opinion before treating any object attributed to this name as authenticated.
Further reading and resources
Data current as of 2026-07-18.

